After 6 years, an 800% increase followed by a 98% crash, the collapse of the ‘artificial meat influencer’ Beyond Meat

After 6 years, an 800% increase followed by a 98% crash, the collapse of the ‘artificial meat influencer’ Beyond Meat


Beyond Meat, a company once hailed as the “internet celebrity of plant-based meat,” has experienced a dramatic fall from star stock to “junk stock.”

In May 2019, Beyond Meat went public with the halo of “healthy eating” and “environmental awareness,” perfectly aligning with the market trends at the time. The company’s stock price soared over 800% after its IPO, making it one of the best-performing IPOs of 2019.

However, by 2024, Beyond Meat’s stock price had plummeted over 90% from its peak to less than $3, with its market value evaporating by billions of dollars.

This painful lesson once again proves how Wall Street’s hype machine can package a seemingly revolutionary concept into an investment bubble: persistent losses, intensified competition, overpriced valuations, and low customer retention rates are all dangerous signals masked by fervent market sentiment.

Wall Street’s Fantastical Tale: 800% Crazy Surge

Beyond Meat was in the limelight when it went public in May 2019.

This plant-based meat alternative company targeted consumers who wanted to reduce meat consumption without sacrificing taste and texture, perfectly aligning with the growing trend of health consciousness and environmental awareness among this demographic. As the company and other plant-based meat firms continuously improved product flavors, sales surged, and stock prices soared. Partnerships with restaurants and retailers expanded, and consumer acceptance increased.

The company’s stock price experienced a staggering rise, climbing over 800% within a few months after its IPO. This astonishing performance made Beyond Meat one of the best-performing IPOs of 2019. Alexia Howard, a senior research analyst in the U.S. food industry at Bernstein, recalled:

“Everyone wanted a piece of the pie. Everyone wanted to tell their story, which encouraged people to try these products.”

Data from market research firm Circana showed that the entire plant-based meat market reached $1.3 billion in sales in 2020, a 46% increase from 2019. This figure seemed impressive, but compared to Wall Street’s expectations, it was merely a drop in the bucket.

At that time, Wall Street analysts wove a beautiful narrative. John Baumgartner, a senior equity analyst for food and healthy living at Mizuho Securities, stated:

“Much of the early optimism surrounding the investment case for Beyond Meat’s IPO stemmed from expectations that plant-based meat could capture a market share in the meat market similar to that achieved by plant-based beverages in the milk market. Wall Street has data suggesting this opportunity could scale to $20 billion to $30 billion over a decade.

This comparison itself is misleading. Plant-based milk alternatives face entirely different consumer habits and technological challenges than plant-based meat alternatives, but Wall Street selectively ignored these fundamental differences

Devastating Crash: 90% Value Erosion

Despite the fervor surrounding Beyond Meat, several warning signs are evident for investors who conduct thorough research.

First, the company is still losing money, with quarterly reports showing massive net losses while struggling to achieve profitability.

Beyond Meat’s product pricing carries a premium compared to traditional meats, limiting its appeal to price-sensitive consumers. This pricing strategy initially worked, but as the novelty wore off and competitors offered cheaper alternatives, this strategy proved unsustainable.

As the initial enthusiasm wanes, customer retention has become an increasingly serious issue. Many consumers tried Beyond Meat products once or twice but did not become regular purchasers, leading to sales growth falling short of expectations and disappointing quarterly performance.

Marion Nestle, Professor Emerita of Nutrition, Food Studies, and Public Health at New York University, pointed out sharply:

“It was originally framed as a major disruption to the food supply and a significant threat to the beef industry, but that has not been the case.

Moreover, competition in the plant-based meat sector is rapidly intensifying. Established food giants like Tyson Foods and Nestlé have launched their own alternative protein products, while smaller startups are entering the market with innovative offerings.

Supply chain challenges and production issues have further damaged the company’s reputation. Beyond Meat struggled to maintain consistent product quality while scaling operations to meet what turned out to be overly optimistic initial demand forecasts.

By 2024, Beyond Meat’s stock price had plummeted over 90% from its peak. This dramatic decline wiped out billions in market value, causing significant losses for many investors.

Beyond Meat’s predicament is not an isolated case. Reports indicate that the internal valuation of competitor Impossible Foods has dropped by at least half. The previous year, Kellogg announced plans to split into three companies, including MorningStar Farms, but when the details of the split were finalized the following year, the company admitted that MorningStar did not have enough value to operate independently.

Investment Lesson: Rational Analysis Trumps Market Frenzy

Beyond Meat’s fundamental data is one of the worst cases in the market.

Despite a significant expansion of its product line, the company expects revenue of about $330 million in 2025, a mere 10% increase compared to six years ago, with an operating loss rate as high as 45%. More critically, $1 billion in convertible bonds will mature in March 2027, and the loan market has rendered a brutal judgment: these bonds are currently trading at only about 17% of face value
The collapse of Beyond Meat has provided valuable lessons for investors. First, any concept stock packaged as “disruptive” needs to be scrutinized with extra caution. Second, when Wall Street analysts provide astronomical market forecasts, investors should question the reasonableness and feasibility of these predictions.

Most importantly, this case once again underscores the significance of fundamental analysis. Although the plant-based meat concept sounds environmentally friendly and healthy, the actual consumer acceptance, the product’s cost structure, and its competitiveness against traditional meat are the key factors determining investment success or failure.

For investors still considering investing in concept stocks, the lesson from Beyond Meat is: when everyone is talking about a “revolutionary” opportunity, it is often the time to remain calm and skeptical



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *